California DMV Driver Safety • FAST Program

California DMV FAST Hearing for Speeding Over 100 MPH: How We Got a Set Aside

California's new FAST program can create a separate DMV license problem after a driver is cited for going over 100 mph — even when the traffic court does not suspend the driver's license. We recently defended a driver accused of going 114 mph in a 65 mph zone and obtained a DMV set aside.

✓
CASE RESULT: DMV SET ASIDE

Our client kept her driving privilege after a separate DMV FAST hearing involving an alleged speed of 114 mph.

California DMV FAST hearing result after 114 mph speeding case - DMV action set aside
DMV FAST hearing case result. The result shown is from a specific case and does not guarantee the same outcome in another matter.
Alleged Speed
114 MPH
Speed Limit
65 MPH
Traffic Court
No Suspension
DMV Result
SET ASIDE

What Is California's DMV FAST Program?

FAST stands for Forwarded Actions for Speeding Tickets. The California Department of Motor Vehicles and California Highway Patrol announced the pilot program in December 2025.

Under the program, a CHP citation involving a speed over 100 mph can be forwarded to DMV Driver Safety for review. DMV then looks at the incident and the driver's record and determines whether action against the person's driving privilege is appropriate.

The important part: the DMV proceeding is separate from the traffic court case.

According to DMV, its FAST review is independent of judicial action and does not depend upon the driver first being convicted of the speeding offense.

That distinction catches people by surprise. A driver may resolve the traffic ticket — and may even leave court without a license suspension — and still have a separate DMV Driver Safety matter to deal with.

The DMV reports that CHP issued more than 18,000 citations for speeds over 100 mph in 2024, averaging approximately 1,600 citations per month.

You can read the DMV's official explanation of the FAST program .

What Does Vehicle Code §22348(b) Say About Driving Over 100 MPH?

California Vehicle Code §22348(b) applies to driving on a highway at a speed greater than 100 mph.

For a first conviction, the statute allows the court to impose a fine and also gives the court authority to suspend the person's driving privilege for up to 30 days.

But FAST adds another consideration: DMV Driver Safety can separately review the driver's privilege.

That means a driver should not assume:

  • "The judge didn't suspend me, so I'm done."
  • "I already handled the ticket, so DMV can't do anything."
  • "I have a clean driving record, so there is nothing to prepare for."

For the statutory language, see California Vehicle Code §22348 .

Our Case: 114 MPH, Court Case Resolved, But DMV Wasn't Finished

Our client had already retained another attorney for the traffic citation. The allegation was not borderline: 114 mph in a 65 mph zone.

The traffic matter was resolved and the court did not impose a driver's license suspension.

But that did not end the license issue.

She still had a separate DMV Driver Safety hearing under the new FAST program.

When I reviewed the case, there were several important things working in her favor. She had an unusually clean driving history, this did not appear to be part of an ongoing pattern of dangerous driving, and she had already taken affirmative steps after the citation.

The issue wasn't how to make 114 mph sound better. It was how to show DMV that one terrible decision did not define the driver standing in front of the hearing officer.

Our Strategy: Don't Minimize 114 MPH

One of the biggest things we discussed before the hearing was what not to do.

I did not want my client trying to explain away the speed.

What We Did NOT Want

  • "The gas pedal is sensitive."
  • "It's a newer car."
  • "The road was open."
  • "I didn't realize I was going that fast."
  • "Other people were speeding."
  • "It was only for a short period."

Those answers can quickly turn an attempt to provide context into what sounds like minimizing or making excuses.

What We Wanted DMV to Hear

  • It was a serious speed.
  • It was a poor decision.
  • There was no good excuse for it.
  • This was an isolated incident.
  • She took corrective action.
  • Her behavior changed afterward.

The Order of Our Presentation Mattered

1
Accountability Own the 114 mph allegation without excuses.
2
Isolated Incident Put the event in the context of her driving history.
3
Corrective Action Show what she did after the citation.
4
Changed Behavior Explain what she actually does differently now.
5
Hardship Only then explain work, children and driving needs.

Corrective Action Has to Mean More Than a Certificate

Before the hearing, our client completed a defensive-driving course dealing specifically with the dangers of speeding.

But I did not want our presentation to stop at:

"Here is my certificate. I took a class."

The more important questions were what she actually learned from it and what changed afterward.

A hearing officer can distinguish between someone who checked a box because a hearing was coming and someone who can articulate why the conduct was dangerous and what she now does differently.

What Did the DMV Hearing Officer Ask?

The hearing itself was interesting because the hearing officer developed a substantial part of the hardship record directly.

The hearing officer asked about:

  • How much our client drives;
  • Why she needs her vehicle;
  • Her two children's school and daycare transportation;
  • Pickups and drop-offs;
  • Her older child's activities;
  • Whether her husband could handle the transportation;
  • Her need to travel to Los Angeles for work;
  • Alternative transportation;
  • Whether she owned or leased the vehicle;
  • Whether the vehicle was insured; and
  • Whether she had pending citations or accidents.

The Questions I Asked My Client

Once the hearing officer had already established much of the hardship evidence, I did not need to ask the same questions all over again.

Instead, I concentrated on the pieces of our defense that still needed to be developed.

Examples of the Questions We Used

  • Looking back now, what are your thoughts about driving 114 mph that day?
  • Do you understand how serious that speed was?
  • Are you trying to make excuses for what happened?
  • Do you accept responsibility for your decision that day?
  • Is driving at that kind of speed normally how you drive?
  • How would you describe your driving history before this incident?
  • Did this incident get your attention?
  • What did you take away from the defensive-driving course?
  • What have you actually changed about the way you drive?

Why We Put Remorse Before Hardship

Our client had very real reasons for needing her license.

She worked in Los Angeles. She had two young children, ages two and seven. She was primarily responsible for school, daycare, pickups, drop-offs and activities because her husband's law-enforcement work schedule did not allow him to consistently handle those responsibilities.

But I did not want that to be the first thing DMV heard from us.

Weak Framing

"Please don't suspend me because I need my license for work and my children."

Our Framing

"I made a serious mistake. I understand it. I've taken corrective action. This isn't how I normally drive. Now let me explain what a suspension would mean."

That distinction matters.

The hardship does not excuse the conduct. It becomes another reason for DMV to consider whether a suspension is actually necessary after accountability and corrective action have already been established.

Why Preparation for a FAST Hearing Matters

A driver could walk into a hearing and simply say:

"I'm sorry. I need my license. Please don't suspend me."

We approached it differently.

Before the hearing, we identified the damaging fact we could not change, the facts that helped us, the questions the client was likely to encounter, the answers that could accidentally hurt her, and the order in which we wanted the evidence to develop.

We also prepared her demeanor: listen to the question, answer it honestly, don't guess, don't interrupt, don't over-explain, and don't try to be her own lawyer.

And when the hearing officer had already established a useful fact, I did not ask the same question simply because it appeared on my outline.

Good hearing preparation is not about asking the most questions. It is about knowing which facts still need to get into the record.

The Result: DMV Set Aside the Action

After the hearing, DMV set aside the action against our client's driving privilege.

She kept her license.

That does not mean every driver accused of going over 100 mph will receive the same result. Every FAST case has its own facts, driving history, circumstances and evidence.

But this result demonstrates why a FAST hearing should not simply be treated as a formality — even when the alleged speed is as serious as 114 mph.

The Judge Didn't Suspend My License. Why Is DMV Still Involved?

Because the court case and DMV Driver Safety proceeding are separate.

This is an issue California drivers also encounter in DUI cases, where the criminal proceeding and DMV administrative proceeding can produce different outcomes.

For more information about California DMV license proceedings, see our Orange County DUI and DMV defense guide .

For additional court, DMV and defense resources, visit our Orange County Criminal Defense Resources .

You can also read our California traffic and speeding defense guide .

California DMV FAST Hearing FAQs

What does FAST stand for?

FAST stands for Forwarded Actions for Speeding Tickets. It is a California DMV and CHP pilot program involving drivers cited for speeds over 100 mph.

Does a 100+ mph ticket automatically mean my license will be suspended?

Not necessarily. Vehicle Code §22348(b) gives the court suspension authority in qualifying cases, while FAST separately allows DMV Driver Safety to review whether administrative action against the driver's privilege is warranted.

Can DMV act even if the judge did not suspend my license?

Yes. DMV describes FAST review as independent of the court proceeding. A traffic-court result therefore does not necessarily end the separate Driver Safety matter.

Does DMV need a conviction before conducting a FAST review?

According to DMV's announcement of the FAST program, its review does not depend upon a conviction.

Does a clean driving record matter at a FAST hearing?

It can be important context because DMV states that Driver Safety reviews both the incident and the driver's record. A good record does not erase the alleged speed, but it may help distinguish an isolated event from an ongoing pattern.

Should I take a defensive-driving course before my hearing?

Corrective action may be useful, but the certificate alone is not the entire presentation. In our 114 mph case, we used the course as part of a larger mitigation strategy involving accountability, driving history, changed behavior and hardship.

Can a driver actually win a DMV FAST hearing?

A FAST hearing can result in no action depending on the particular facts. In the case discussed here, our client was accused of driving 114 mph in a 65 mph zone, and after the hearing DMV set aside the action against her driving privilege. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Facing a California DMV FAST Hearing?

If you received a DMV Driver Safety notice after a 100+ mph speeding citation, don't assume that handling the traffic ticket takes care of the DMV proceeding.

We can review the citation, DMV notice, driving history and circumstances of the case and discuss how to prepare for the hearing.

Schedule a Consultation Call (714) 589-3063

Disclaimer: This page is provided for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. Every DMV and traffic case depends on its individual facts. Past results do not guarantee future results.